otp asks

nerdymomfriend:

veridium-bye:

For the Fluff:

1. What are things they both find funny?
2. If they could each describe each other in one sentence, what would it be?
3. If they complimented each other, what would they say?
4. What would be their ship name?
5. What activities do they enjoy together?
6. What is/are their love language(s)?
7. Write a ~300 word love scene for them. 
8. What were their first impressions of each other?

For the Angst:

9. Have they made each other cry?
10. Write a ~300 word argument scene for them. 
11. What causes them to fight?
12. Do they have differing political opinions?
13. Name something they would never do for the other person. 
14. What would be a dealbreaker?
15. What are traits they dislike in one another?
16. If they broke up, what would be their opinions of each other?

For the Depth: 

17. What senses (sights, smells, feelings, etc). remind them of each other?
18. What would be their love motto?
19. If they could each write a single line in their marriage vows, what would they be?
20. What is a promise they have made to each other?
21. How have they changed each other for the better/for the worse?
22. If their lives were what was originally intended at birth, would they have still fallen in love?
23. Write a ~300 scene between them with no dialogue, only body language.
24. What is something they have each had to forgive the other for?

For the Dirty:

25. What moves do they know work on the other?
26. What are their favorite parts about physical affection/sex?
27. Do they have any kinks/fetishes that they share?
28. Write a ~300 fantasy one of them has about the other. 
29. What are each of their signature foreplay moves?
30. Write a short exchange of dirty talk between them. 
31. What do they love to do after sex?
32. Do they enjoy morning or night sex?

Ok folks, you know the drill! Ask me about any ship(s) from Hogan’s Heroes or the Rat Patrol and I will be more than happy to answer. Ask as many or as few questions as you like; however, numbers 7, 10, 23, 28, and 30 are off limits. If you really want me to write something for your particular ship/idea, send me a message and I’d be more than happy to talk to you about it! 

send me a ship & i’ll tell you

the-restless-brook:

  • who is more likely to fall asleep on the couch
  • who makes meals and who is more likely to hoard take-out menus
  • who gives nicknames
  • favorite non-sexual activity 
  • who leaves notes for the other to find
  • who crosses the street to pet a cute dog
  • who takes notes on the other’s favorite foods and makes sure the fridge is stocked
  • who initiates sex most of the time
  • who apologizes first after a fight
  • who is more protective 
  • who says “I love you” first

anosognosic:

argumate:

problematic tropes are only problematic due to their prevalence, not bad in and of themselves; they are bad on a statistical level.

this complicates the discourse significantly as it means any individual application of a terrible trope is not very terrible at all, a subtlety that is hard to express and which most people don’t seem to get.

bold talk for a post that doesn’t even pass the bechdel test

thequantumwritings:

Sometimes i think about the idea of Common as a language in fantasy settings.

On the one hand, it’s a nice convenient narrative device that doesn’t necessarily need to be explored, but if you do take a moment to think about where it came from or what it might look like, you find that there’s really only 2 possible origins.

In settings where humans speak common and only Common, while every other race has its own language and also speaks Common, the implication is rather clear: at some point in the setting’s history, humans did the imperialism thing, and while their empire has crumbled, the only reason everyone speaks Human is that way back when, they had to, and since everyone speaks it, the humans rebranded their language as Common and painted themselves as the default race in a not-so-subtle parallel of real-world whiteness.

In settings where Human and Common are separate languages, though (and I haven’t seen nearly as many of these as I’d like), Common would have developed communally between at least three or four races who needed to communicate all together. With only two races trying to communicate, no one would need to learn more than one new language, but if, say, a marketplace became a trading hub for humans, dwarves, orcs, and elves, then either any given trader would need to learn three new languages to be sure that they could talk to every potential customer, OR a pidgin could spring up around that marketplace that eventually spreads as the traders travel the world.

Drop your concept of Common meaning “english, but in middle earth” for a moment and imagine a language where everyone uses human words for produce, farming, and carpentry; dwarven words for gemstones, masonry, and construction; elven words for textiles, magic, and music; and orcish words for smithing weaponry/armor, and livestock. Imagine that it’s all tied together with a mishmash of grammatical structures where some words conjugate and others don’t, some adjectives go before the noun and some go after, and plurals and tenses vary wildly based on what you’re talking about.

Now try to tell me that’s not infinitely more interesting.

This is a good idea, but my one caution is that it could lead to overcomplicated world-building. You shouldn’t have to be Tolkien and create you own language(s) before you write the darn book.

deirdrearchleone:

“One of the simplest ways to make the audience like a character is to show him liking other people. One of the easiest ways to make the audience care about a character is to show him caring about other people. We care about Harry Potter in no small part because he cares so much about his friends. It’s impossible to imagine Harry seeing Hermione get hurt and feeling anything but horror and guilt, no matter how terrible a fight they might have had beforehand. Katniss is by design a more prickly and “difficult” protagonist than Harry is, or than Moss seems intended to be, but we care about her from the start because we see how deeply she loves her sister and her willingness to sacrifice herself to protect her. Bad writers, though, often make the mistake of thinking that you make a character likable by showing that other characters like him, and make the audience care about him by showing that other characters care about him. This tends to have exactly the opposite effect. At a certain point the reader starts to wonder what’s so great about this guy that everyone is showering him with praise, and starts actively wanting to see him fail or be told off.”

https://fail-fandomanon.dreamwidth.org/325399.html?thread=1869956375#cmt1869956375
(via pitviperofdoom)

alyseofwonderland:

1 am thought: Tolkien wrote the original cross over au, taking Shakespeare, arthurian legend, and Norse Mythology to make his era’s SuperWhoLock, which he filled with his OCs, many that are either based on friends or work enemies, while also fixing canon issues, he went to the bar to drink and tell his buddies his head canons, wrote his fan fiction when he was supposed to be doing work, and he would receive comments begging to publish the next in the series from his readers. Tolkien was the OG cross over fandom writer and now he is taught in schools. 

Writing a book that is influenced by other books/plays is not fanficiton. Influence does not equal fanfiction. 

spadesjadesfiction:

anais-ninja-bitch:

matt-the-blind-cinnamon-roll:

tjmystic:

So, when I was doing my thesis on whether or not fanfiction should be considered a legitimate genre of literature, my advising professor asked me for examples.  I gave him the generic ones, of course – “Pride & Prejudice and Zombies” is a horror fanfic of “Pride & Prejudice”, “50 Shades of Grey” is an erotica fic of “Twilight" – and that seemed to make him understand what fanfiction is, but not how it’s useful.  So I thought about it, and, after about a minute, I said, “Paradise Lost is basically a fanfiction of the Book of Genesis.  And The Divine Comedy is an epic self-insertion fic for Catholic doctrine.  So, basically, you were teaching us fanfiction last semester.”  I had never before seen a grown man’s eyes widen with such fear, incomprehension, disgust, awe, and understanding.

#does that mean the renaissance was almost entirely fan art?

Yes. Yes it does. All ur classic favs had the Renaissance version of DeviantArt. 

l i s t e n

It occured to me that all historical fiction is “real person fanfic.” You are taking real people and putting them into fictional situations, or taking dramatic license with real events and real people. Fanfiction. 

Not all historical fiction is about real people, though. Some is about a whole cast of fictional people in a historical setting. You are right about the ones that are, like Wolf Hall or The Other Boleyn Sister, but that’s not “all historical fiction.” 

fierceawakening:

lookashiny:

fierceawakening:

n-o-ramos:

Toxic Relationships in Fiction

Something I’ve seen a lot lately, which really bothers me, is how romance novels centered around a toxic relationship (with the female typically being the party who is the victim in the situation) are so incredibly popular.

 Like bonkers popular. 

To the point where large publishing companies encourage their authors to write these kinds of relationships.

I’ll be the first to admit, the relationship in my novel is a horrible, toxic, abusive relationship. But I’m writing a horror novel. The relationship is supposed to scare its readers.

I’ve read way too many books where the toxic, abusive relationship is romanticized. “He stalks her out of love. It’s romantic.”.

 Um. No. I was stalked by someone who was “in love” with me. It wasn’t romantic. It was the scariest thing I ever had happen to me.

Bottom line, let’s stop romanticizing shitty relationships. 

What does romanticizing mean in this context, though? Like what exactly is the thing you want people to stop doing?

Because every time I’ve tried to come up with a definition for that it’s ended up splash damaging something that’s actually good.

Not OP, but I have read a fair amount of romance novels (some of which I liked ,even) that have creepy things like stalking openly depicted as romantic. There’s one that I liked 90% of, where the heroine leaves the hero after a fight and decided to take a plane home, so he follows her to the airport and yells at her to go back with him. When she refuses, he picks her up and carries her back to his car and basically forces her back to their hotel room. This was not depicted as a flaw of his, but rather as evidence that she should have just never left. That’s creepy. Stuff like that isn’t is as many romance novels as it used to be, but it’s around enough to annoy me.

Ah, okay. I don’t read a lot of straight romance but I read a fair amount of gay romance and I’m pretty sure what I write is classified as “erotic romance” by my publisher.

Stuff like this worries me because I’ve seen, like, “character a does something like that, character b emphatically tells them off for it and a acknowledges b is right, but they still end up together eventually because $weirdplottwist” get labeled as this.

Which worries me as a writer because… often, the conflict in this genre s interpersonal stuff. Which means that if everyone must be depicted as good at healthy relationships, it becomes very hard to come up with believable conflict.

Which I feel like I actually see in some lesfic. The characters are so obviously not flawed that whatever is keeping them apart feels unrealistic.

Which is why I asked for specifics. I want to make sure the critique is nuanced enough to take that into account.

Yeah, it’s a lot more of a thing in what I’d call mainstream straight romance. Obviously, interpersonal conflict is the main kind of conflict there, but there’s good kinds and bad kinds. I’ve read romance novels where one of them screws up or accidentally says the wrong thing and then they have to work through that, which is fine. Heck, I don’t mind a certain amount of dysfunction, as long as it’s obvious that’s what it is. Unfortunately, either from norms in straight romance novels or writer inexperience or whatever, bad/toxic behavior can be glossed over or just presented as romantic. And by presented as romantic I mean, for example, the heroine complains to her (usually female sometimes male) relatives about the hero being controlling or stalking her, only for them to brush it off or say “he’s just worried about you” or whatever, and they’re presented as right.