someone: i’ve read fanfiction that’s better than most books i’ve read
me, interally: maybe you should… read more books
Exceedingly large mood.
Tag: books
so metropolitan museum of art has a register of books they’ve published that are out of print and that you can download for free! they’re mostly books on art, archeology, architecture, fashion and history and i just think that’s super useful and interesting so i wanted to share! you can find all of the books available here!

Toxic Relationships in Fiction
Something I’ve seen a lot lately, which really bothers me, is how romance novels centered around a toxic relationship (with the female typically being the party who is the victim in the situation) are so incredibly popular.
Like bonkers popular.
To the point where large publishing companies encourage their authors to write these kinds of relationships.
I’ll be the first to admit, the relationship in my novel is a horrible, toxic, abusive relationship. But I’m writing a horror novel. The relationship is supposed to scare its readers.
I’ve read way too many books where the toxic, abusive relationship is romanticized. “He stalks her out of love. It’s romantic.”.
Um. No. I was stalked by someone who was “in love” with me. It wasn’t romantic. It was the scariest thing I ever had happen to me.
Bottom line, let’s stop romanticizing shitty relationships.
What does romanticizing mean in this context, though? Like what exactly is the thing you want people to stop doing?
Because every time I’ve tried to come up with a definition for that it’s ended up splash damaging something that’s actually good.
Not OP, but I have read a fair amount of romance novels (some of which I liked ,even) that have creepy things like stalking openly depicted as romantic. There’s one that I liked 90% of, where the heroine leaves the hero after a fight and decided to take a plane home, so he follows her to the airport and yells at her to go back with him. When she refuses, he picks her up and carries her back to his car and basically forces her back to their hotel room. This was not depicted as a flaw of his, but rather as evidence that she should have just never left. That’s creepy. Stuff like that isn’t is as many romance novels as it used to be, but it’s around enough to annoy me.
Word on the Water, London, a 1920s barge that has been made into a bookshop. It used to travel along Regent’s Canal, but is now permanently moored by Granary Square in King’s Cross.
Must see! @lookashiny


Why do post like that lesbianamyr0se always sound like they’d be in the first row when Nazis burned book and art they deemed wrong? Or any other fascist regime who thought that wrong-think is something you can punish.
Because whether they realise it or not, they essentially condone the same mindset and methods as these groups. Only their label and their content is different. They can’t deal with a free pluralist society, so they long for totalitarianism – but it’s not totalitarianism to them, because it only forbids the things they think are wrong, meaning no true freedom gets taken away from them. Or at least that’s what they naively believe, because they don’t understand the consequences.
This is one of the reasons I’m so vehemently against any kind of censorship of literature and the arts – as soon as you give anyone the tools to ban something on the nebulous grounds of morality and decency, you’ve opened the floodgates for people who have far less noble goals in mind.
I’ve read the speeches given at the Nazi book burnings. I’ve heard the slogans they used, spewed right out of the mouth of Goebbels himself, and yes, they sound exactly like some of the things I’ve read in the arguments of antis why this or that fanfiction or book should be banned – because they are polluting and weakening the minds of young people, because they advance the spread of sexual deviancy. We’re not just talking about books about queer themes here, we’re also talking about books that acknowledged that women have sexual fantasies outside of what is considered the norm (hell, that they have sexual fantasies at all).
If you sound like Josef goddamn Goebbels, maybe it’s time to sit your ass down and re-think your position.
The thing is, to keep people from ringing the Godwin alarm, this doesn’t apply solely to fascism and fascist regimes. I was born and spent the early years of my life behind the Iron Curtain. The list of banned shit on various grounds was so extensive that it spawned its entire category of jokes. Book-smuggling was very much a thing, entailing significant risk (though, in typical Eastern European fashion, it wasn’t as profitable as smuggling in blue-jeans, coffee that didn’t fucking suck, chocolate and tapes with banned films). My own father had a hidden library stuffed with Western, foreign-language books, some dating from before WWII and the Soviet domination, others bought ‘under the table’. And when I say ‘hidden library’, I mean he kept all the books in sacks, among building and household materials, where hardly anyone would look for them. Others saved entire troves of historical and religious texts from destruction by stuffing them inside walls and bricking them over.
Totalitarianism and authoritarianism, regardless of their position on the political spectrum, are the death of knowledge, of free dissemination of information, of thinking that isn’t black-and-white and chained to the purposes of one ideology or another. The fact that people like the individual described above keep rubbing one out to totalitarian / authoritarian thought isn’t a surprise on Tumblr, a community with very poor knowledge of history and a habit of willingly putting on blinders.
Approximately once a day, I wonder whether antis even know about this. Because I don’t see how you could know about it and STILL think “oh but this time it’s different!”
It’s never different. You’re never better than the others.
And this is why it’s bad, kids! Stop being the thought police.

who’s gonna tell them that lolita is fucking banned in most places lol
OP, do a moment’s research, it helps you to not appear to be such a colossal idiot in public. While Lolita was banned in a few countries at the time of its release in the 1950s, it does not appear to have been prohibited in any country in the last 50 years.
They’re for book banning now? Yeesh.
Yeah. Because book banning is usually a BAD THING. FFS, OP, Lolita being banned (even in the past) is not a good thing.









